Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in City of Pasadena water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of Pasadena is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Pasadena, Texas, serving about 152,000 people, including Houston, Pasadena. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 9 sampling points between Mar 2024 and Jan 2026.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
12 of 24 | 12.7 ppt | 9.4 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
15 of 24 | 8.4 ppt | 7.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
15 of 24 | 7.0 ppt | 6.4 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
6 of 24 | 4.9 ppt | 3.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
8 of 24 | 4.3 ppt | 3.8 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
7 of 24 | 3.5 ppt | 3.3 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 24 | 3.3 ppt | 1.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFDA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFMBA, PFDoA, PFMPA, PFEESA, PFOA, PFNA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, NFDHA, PFHpS, PFPeS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 18.7 ppb, detected in 14 of 24 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- City of Mesquite 4 PFAS detected
- City of Denton 4 PFAS detected
- City of League City 6 PFAS detected
- City of Midland Water Purification Plant 6 PFAS detected
- City of Waco 1 PFAS detected
- City of Killeen 3 PFAS detected
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
77057 77501 77502 77503 77504 77505 77506 77508
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Pasadena water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX1010293. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/city-of-pasadena/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX1010293). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.