Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFBA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in City of League City water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of League City is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in League City, Texas, serving about 149,557 people, including League City, Webster. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 12 times across 4 sampling points between Dec 2024 and Mar 2026.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
10 of 12 | 102 ppt | 43.9 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
9 of 12 | 31.9 ppt | 16.1 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
10 of 12 | 7.1 ppt | 5.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 12 | 4.8 ppt | 2.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 12 | 4.5 ppt | 1.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 12 | 4.1 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFUnA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, 8:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFMPA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFOA, PFNA, PFHpA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 4:2 FTS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 15.5 ppb, detected in 5 of 12 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- City of Denton 4 PFAS detected
- City of Pasadena 7 PFAS detected
- City of Mesquite 4 PFAS detected
- City of Waco 1 PFAS detected
- City of Midland Water Purification Plant 6 PFAS detected
- City of Lewisville 4 PFAS detected
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
77573 77598
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of League City water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX0840007. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/city-of-league-city/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX0840007). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.