Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in City of Georgetown water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of Georgetown is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Georgetown, Texas, serving about 191,639 people, including Florence, Jarrell, Killeen, Georgetown, Leander, Liberty Hill. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 22 times across 6 sampling points between Jun 2023 and Feb 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
13 of 22 | 33.8 ppt | 16.9 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
19 of 22 | 18.7 ppt | 8.9 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
11 of 22 | 10.1 ppt | 4.2 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
19 of 22 | 9.6 ppt | 9.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
3 of 22 | 5.7 ppt | 3.6 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 22 | 4.9 ppt | 1.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
11 of 22 | 4.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: PFDA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFTrDA, PFDoA, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFHpS, PFNA, PFMPA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpA, PFEESA, PFPeS, PFMBA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, NFDHA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 17.4 ppb, detected in 10 of 22 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- Mcallen Public Utility 1 PFAS detected
- Brownsville Public Utilities Board above an EPA limit
- Amarillo Municipal Water System 1 PFAS detected
- City of Grand Prairie above an EPA limit
- Dallas Fort Worth International Airport 3 PFAS detected
- North Alamo WSC 5 PFAS detected
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
76527 76537 76549 78626 78627 78628 78633 78641 78642 78681
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Georgetown water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX2460001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/city-of-georgetown/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX2460001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.