Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in City of Sacramento Main water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Sacramento Main averaged 38.8 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 9.7 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

City of Sacramento Main Serves 527,979 people · 28 PFOA samples from 13 sampling points · Aug 2023 to May 2024 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 16.4 ppt avg · max 17.3
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 38.8 ppt avg · max 41.4
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 18.8 ppt avg · max 19.1
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 1.9 avg · max 1.9
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFHpA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

City of Sacramento Main is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Sacramento, California, serving about 527,979 people, including Mcclellan, North Highlands, Rio Linda, Elk Grove, Sacramento. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 28 times across 13 sampling points between Aug 2023 and May 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
6 of 28 41.4 ppt 38.8 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
6 of 28 19.1 ppt 18.8 ppt 10 ppt
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
2 of 28 17.3 ppt 16.4 ppt 4 ppt
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
2 of 28 7.4 ppt 7.2 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
3 of 28 6.5 ppt 6.5 ppt none
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
2 of 28 6.3 ppt 6.0 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
4 of 28 6.2 ppt 6.2 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
2 of 28 4.4 ppt 4.2 ppt none

Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, ADONA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, HFPO-DA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 25.4 ppb, detected in 2 of 28 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in California

All 707 tested systems in California

ZIP codes served

95652 95660 95673 95758 95811 95814 95815 95816 95817 95818 95819 95820 95821 95822 95823 95824 95825 95826 95828 95829 95831 95832 95833 95834 95835 95838 95841 95864

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Sacramento Main water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3410020. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-sacramento-main/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3410020). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.