Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFBA, PFBS, PFPeS.
Is there PFAS in City of Fresno water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Fresno averaged 21.5 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 5.4 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Fresno is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Fresno, California, serving about 545,716 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 339 times across 174 sampling points between Mar 2023 and Dec 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
39 of 339 | 47.0 ppt | 35.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
31 of 339 | 34.0 ppt | 24.0 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
13 of 339 | 31.0 ppt | 24.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
22 of 339 | 30.0 ppt | 29.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
43 of 339 | 30.0 ppt | 21.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
5 of 339 | 26.0 ppt | 25.5 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
36 of 339 | 16.0 ppt | 13.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
16 of 339 | 8.6 ppt | 6.2 ppt | none |
| PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid |
6 of 339 | 8.0 ppt | 8.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
2 of 339 | 5.3 ppt | 5.0 ppt | none |
Not detected: 11Cl-PF3OUdS, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, PFUnA, NFDHA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, PFHpS, PFTA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- City of Sacramento Main above an EPA limit
- Long Beach-city, Water Dept. none detected
- Irvine Ranch Water District 2 PFAS detected
- Eastern Municipal WD none detected
- City of Anaheim above an EPA limit
- Alameda County Water District none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
93701 93702 93703 93704 93705 93706 93710 93711 93720 93721 93722 93723 93725 93726 93727 93728 93730
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Fresno water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA1010007. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-fresno/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA1010007). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.