Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Clear Lake City Water Authority water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Clear Lake City Water Authority averaged 5.7 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 1.4 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Clear Lake City Water Authority is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Houston, Texas, serving about 89,702 people, including Houston, Seabrook, Webster. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 18 times across 5 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Mar 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
14 of 18 | 14.5 ppt | 10.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
15 of 18 | 9.5 ppt | 7.9 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
15 of 18 | 8.8 ppt | 7.7 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
12 of 18 | 6.7 ppt | 5.7 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
12 of 18 | 6.0 ppt | 4.5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
12 of 18 | 5.7 ppt | 4.1 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 18 | 4.0 ppt | 1.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
7 of 18 | 3.7 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: NMeFOSAA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFMPA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, 8:2 FTS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFNA, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFUnA, HFPO-DA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 12.9 ppb, detected in 6 of 18 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- City of Mansfield 3 PFAS detected
- City of Sugar Land 8 PFAS detected
- City of Bryan none detected
- City of Cedar Park 1 PFAS detected
- Aqua WSC none detected
- City of Baytown above an EPA limit
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
77058 77059 77062 77586 77598
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Clear Lake City Water Authority water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX1010056. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/clear-lake-city-water-authority/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX1010056). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.