Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in City of North Richland Hills water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of North Richland Hills is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in North Richland Hills, Texas, serving about 74,859 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 2 sampling points between Jan 2024 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
1 of 8 | 9.5 ppt | 2.4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
8 of 8 | 8.5 ppt | 6.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
6 of 8 | 5.5 ppt | 3.7 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
6 of 8 | 4.9 ppt | 4.2 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
5 of 8 | 4.6 ppt | 4.3 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 8 | 4.2 ppt | 1.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 8 | 4.2 ppt | 1.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, 6:2 FTS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, PFHpA, 4:2 FTS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- City of San Marcos 3 PFAS detected
- City of Mission 1 PFAS detected
- City of Pharr 1 PFAS detected
- Southern Utilities 1 PFAS detected
- Town of Flower Mound 6 PFAS detected
- City of Houston UD 5 - Kingwood none detected
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
76180 76182
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of North Richland Hills water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX2200063. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/city-of-north-richland-hills/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX2200063). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.