Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA, PFBS, PFPeS.
Is there PFAS in City of Abilene water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Abilene averaged 25.3 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 6.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Abilene is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Abilene, Texas, serving about 130,501 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 12 times across 3 sampling points between Sep 2023 and Jun 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
11 of 12 | 43.1 ppt | 21.8 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
11 of 12 | 32.4 ppt | 26.1 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
8 of 12 | 30.0 ppt | 25.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
9 of 12 | 23.5 ppt | 20.2 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
8 of 12 | 22.9 ppt | 17.2 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
8 of 12 | 12.4 ppt | 9.8 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
11 of 12 | 8.2 ppt | 6.9 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
8 of 12 | 7.7 ppt | 6.9 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
2 of 12 | 4.5 ppt | 1.1 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFMBA, PFMPA, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFTrDA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFHpS, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, HFPO-DA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, PFTA, PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 9Cl-PF3ONS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 48.1 ppb, detected in 11 of 12 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Texas
- City of Round Rock 4 PFAS detected
- City of Pearland 6 PFAS detected
- City of Carrollton 4 PFAS detected
- City of Odessa 3 PFAS detected
- City of Richardson 4 PFAS detected
- City of Lewisville 4 PFAS detected
All 1154 tested systems in Texas
ZIP codes served
79601 79602 79603 79604 79605 79606
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Abilene water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX2210001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/city-of-abilene/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX2210001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.