Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA.
Is there PFAS in Shady Grove Utility District water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Shady Grove Utility District is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Dandridge, Tennessee, serving about 25,320 people, including Dandridge, Jefferson City, Kodak, New Market, Strawberry Plains. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 2 sampling points between Jul 2023 and Jul 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 8 | 4.7 ppt | 2.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 8 | 4.2 ppt | 1.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFBS, PFHpA, PFDA, PFNA, PFOA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, PFHxS, PFHxA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFTA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFDoA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Tennessee
- Dayton Water Dept none detected
- Manchester Water Department above an EPA limit
- Anderson County Water Authority 1 PFAS detected
- Winchester Water System none detected
- Portland Water System none detected
- Lewisburg Water System 6 PFAS detected
All 277 tested systems in Tennessee
ZIP codes served
37725 37760 37764 37820 37871
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Shady Grove Utility District water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TN0000626. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/tennessee/shady-grove-utility-district/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TN0000626). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.