Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBA, PFHpA, PFDA.
Is there PFAS in Manchester Water Department water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Manchester Water Department averaged 4.4 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.1 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Manchester Water Department is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Manchester, Tennessee, serving about 24,975 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Apr 2024 and Jan 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 4 | 11.6 ppt | 4.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 4 | 10.3 ppt | 4.2 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 4 | 7.5 ppt | 3.1 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 4 | 6.6 ppt | 1.6 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 4 | 6.3 ppt | 3.5 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 4 | 5.8 ppt | 2.8 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 4.2 ppt | 1.1 ppt | none |
| PFDA Perfluorodecanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 3.0 ppt | 0.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFMPA, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFDoA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFMBA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Tennessee
- Winchester Water System none detected
- Dayton Water Dept none detected
- Shady Grove Utility District 2 PFAS detected
- Lewisburg Water System 6 PFAS detected
- Maury CO Water System 6 PFAS detected
- Anderson County Water Authority 1 PFAS detected
All 277 tested systems in Tennessee
ZIP codes served
37355
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Manchester Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TN0000429. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/tennessee/manchester-water-department/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TN0000429). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.