Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Orangeburg Dpu (3810001) water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Orangeburg Dpu (3810001) is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Orangeburg, South Carolina, serving about 47,463 people, including Bowman, Cameron, Cope, Cordova, Neeses, Norway. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Apr 2024 and Dec 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 4.6 ppt | 1.1 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 4 | 4.2 ppt | 1.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 3.7 ppt | 0.9 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 3.7 ppt | 0.9 ppt | none |
Not detected: HFPO-DA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, NFDHA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFEESA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFMBA, PFNA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, PFHpS, PFBS, ADONA, PFHxS, PFPeS, PFOA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in South Carolina
- Joint Municipal WSC (3220003) above an EPA limit
- Myrtle Beach City of (sc2610001) 7 PFAS detected
- Laurens County W&s Comm (sc3020001) above an EPA limit
- N Myrtle Beach City of (sc2610011) above an EPA limit
- Goose Creek City of (0810004) above an EPA limit
- Aiken City of (0210001) 2 PFAS detected
All 165 tested systems in South Carolina
ZIP codes served
29018 29030 29038 29039 29107 29113 29115 29116 29118 29133
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Orangeburg Dpu (3810001) water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID SC3810001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/south-carolina/orangeburg-dpu-3810001/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID SC3810001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.