Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Laurens County W&s Comm (sc3020001) water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Laurens County W&s Comm (sc3020001) averaged 35.1 ppt of HFPO-DA at its worst sampling point, 3.5 times the EPA limit of 10 ppt.
Laurens County W&s Comm (sc3020001) is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Laurens, South Carolina, serving about 44,866 people, including Clinton, Cross Hill, Enoree, Joanna, Kinards, Laurens. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 12 times across 3 sampling points between Dec 2023 and Aug 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFPO-DA GenX (HFPO-DA) |
5 of 12 | 95.8 ppt | 35.1 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
7 of 12 | 23.7 ppt | 10.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
7 of 12 | 19.3 ppt | 8.6 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
7 of 12 | 14.3 ppt | 10.5 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
7 of 12 | 8.7 ppt | 8.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
6 of 12 | 7.5 ppt | 5.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 12 | 7.2 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
3 of 12 | 3.4 ppt | 1.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 12 | 3.1 ppt | 1.6 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: 4:2 FTS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, 6:2 FTS, PFNA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, 8:2 FTS, PFEESA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFMBA, PFMPA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in South Carolina
- N Myrtle Beach City of (sc2610011) above an EPA limit
- Goose Creek City of (0810004) above an EPA limit
- Orangeburg Dpu (3810001) 4 PFAS detected
- Joint Municipal WSC (3220003) above an EPA limit
- Gcwsd Waccamaw Neck (sc2220010) above an EPA limit
- Inman Campobello W/d (4220002) none detected
All 165 tested systems in South Carolina
ZIP codes served
29325 29332 29335 29351 29355 29360 29370 29384 29644 29645 29654 29669 29680 29681 29692
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Laurens County W&s Comm (sc3020001) water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID SC3020001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/south-carolina/laurens-county-w-and-s-comm-sc3020001/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID SC3020001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.