Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Harnett Regional Water water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Harnett Regional Water averaged 9.2 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 2.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Harnett Regional Water Serves 121,885 people · 4 PFOA samples from 1 sampling point · Dec 2024 to Sep 2025 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 6.4 ppt avg · max 7.7
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 9.2 ppt avg · max 12.3
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 1.5 ppt avg · max 3.1
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.1 avg · max 0.3
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Harnett Regional Water is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Lillington, North Carolina, serving about 121,885 people, including Sanford, Angier, Broadway, Buies Creek, Coats, Fuquay Varina. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Dec 2024 and Sep 2025.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid		 4 of 4 12.3 ppt 9.2 ppt 4 ppt
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid		 4 of 4 7.7 ppt 6.4 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid		 4 of 4 7.1 ppt 5.6 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid		 4 of 4 6.9 ppt 5.7 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid		 2 of 4 3.6 ppt 1.7 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid		 2 of 4 3.4 ppt 1.7 ppt none
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid		 2 of 4 3.1 ppt 1.5 ppt 10 ppt

Not detected: PFNA, PFBA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, 6:2 FTS, PFDoA, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in North Carolina

All 291 tested systems in North Carolina

ZIP codes served

27332 27501 27505 27506 27521 27526 27540 27543 27546 27552 28323 28326 28334 28335 28339 28356 28368 28390

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Harnett Regional Water water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC0343045. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/harnett-regional-water/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC0343045). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.