Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Brunswick County Water System water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Brunswick County Water System averaged 9.2 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 2.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Brunswick County Water System is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Bolivia, North Carolina, serving about 151,357 people, including Wilmington, Ash, Bolivia, Leland, Longwood, Southport. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 6 times across 2 sampling points between Jan 2023 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 6 | 12.4 ppt | 9.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 11.5 ppt | 6.6 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 9.8 ppt | 5.9 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 8.5 ppt | 5.7 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 7.7 ppt | 5.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
3 of 6 | 7.1 ppt | 4.2 ppt | none |
| HFPO-DA GenX (HFPO-DA) |
1 of 6 | 5.8 ppt | 1.4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
3 of 6 | 5.2 ppt | 3.2 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 4.1 ppt | 2.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: NFDHA, PFPeS, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, PFTA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFHpS, PFDA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, ADONA, PFNA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in North Carolina
- Davidson Water INC none detected
- Onslow Wtr and Sewer Authority none detected
- City of Asheville none detected
- Union County Water System 5 PFAS detected
- Harnett Regional Water above an EPA limit
- City of Concord above an EPA limit
All 291 tested systems in North Carolina
ZIP codes served
28401 28420 28422 28451 28452 28461 28462 28467 28468 28469 28470 28479
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Brunswick County Water System water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC0410045. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/brunswick-county-water-system/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC0410045). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.