Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFPeA.
Is there PFAS in City of Grand Island water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Grand Island averaged 7.3 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 1.8 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Grand Island is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Grand Island, Nebraska, serving about 51,478 people, including Grand Island, Alda. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 16 times across 8 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Jan 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
1 of 16 | 24.6 ppt | 12.3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 7.5 ppt | 7.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 4.8 ppt | 2.4 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
1 of 16 | 3.4 ppt | 1.7 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFNA, PFHxA, PFDoA, PFDA, 4:2 FTS, PFUnA, PFHpA, PFOA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NFDHA, PFHpS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFBA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFPeS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 30.9 ppb, detected in 16 of 16 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Nebraska
- City of Papillion none detected
- City of Kearney none detected
- City of Fremont 2 PFAS detected
- City of Norfolk Ne none detected
- City of North Platte above an EPA limit
- City of Hastings 2 PFAS detected
All 53 tested systems in Nebraska
ZIP codes served
68801 68802 68803 68810
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Grand Island water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NE3107902. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/nebraska/city-of-grand-island/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NE3107902). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.