Is there PFAS in City of Hastings water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of Hastings is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Hastings, Nebraska, serving about 24,927 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 37 times across 19 sampling points between Mar 2023 and Oct 2023.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 37 | 6.6 ppt | 3.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 37 | 6.0 ppt | 5.7 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: HFPO-DA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFPeA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA, PFBA, PFUnA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFHxA, PFDA, PFOA, PFNA, PFHpA, PFBS, 6:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, PFDoA, NEtFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 20 ppb, detected in 37 of 37 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Nebraska
- City of North Platte above an EPA limit
- City of Columbus none detected
- City of Norfolk Ne none detected
- City of Fremont 2 PFAS detected
- City of Kearney none detected
- City of Papillion none detected
All 53 tested systems in Nebraska
ZIP codes served
68901
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Hastings water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NE3100101. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/nebraska/city-of-hastings/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NE3100101). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.