Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, 6:2 FTS, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in City of Oxford water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Oxford averaged 53.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 13.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Oxford is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Oxford, Mississippi, serving about 28,500 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 10 times across 5 sampling points between Mar 2025 and Sep 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 10 | 72.2 ppt | 53.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
5 of 10 | 24.5 ppt | 24.1 ppt | none |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid |
2 of 10 | 22.9 ppt | 20.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
5 of 10 | 15.0 ppt | 14.6 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 10 | 13.6 ppt | 10.3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
6 of 10 | 10.9 ppt | 10.7 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 10 | 5.6 ppt | 5.6 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 10 | 4.4 ppt | 4.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 10 | 3.4 ppt | 3.2 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFTrDA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, NFDHA, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFPeS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, NMeFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Mississippi
- West Jackson CO Utility Dist none detected
- City of Jackson-maddox Rd. none detected
- City of Vicksburg none detected
- City of Greenville none detected
- City of Pearl none detected
- University of Mississippi above an EPA limit
All 239 tested systems in Mississippi
ZIP codes served
38655
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Oxford water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MS0360011. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/mississippi/city-of-oxford/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MS0360011). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.