Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Sweetwater Authority water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Sweetwater Authority averaged 9.2 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 2.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Sweetwater Authority is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Chula Vista, California, serving about 191,282 people, including Bonita, Chula Vista, National City, San Diego. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 3 sampling points between Oct 2024 and Jul 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
4 of 8 | 12.3 ppt | 10.5 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
4 of 8 | 11.4 ppt | 9.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 8 | 11.0 ppt | 9.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 8 | 9.4 ppt | 7.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 8 | 8.6 ppt | 7.1 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
4 of 8 | 7.6 ppt | 6.4 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
3 of 8 | 5.7 ppt | 3.9 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
4 of 8 | 4.7 ppt | 4.0 ppt | none |
Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFMBA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFNA, PFDoA, PFDA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 13.6 ppb, detected in 3 of 8 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- City of Stockton above an EPA limit
- Glendale-city, Water Dept. above an EPA limit
- Sacramento Suburban Water District 4 PFAS detected
- Marin Municipal Water District none detected
- Ontario Municipal Utilities Company above an EPA limit
- Scwa - Laguna/vineyard above an EPA limit
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
91902 91910 91911 91950 92154
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Sweetwater Authority water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3710025. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/sweetwater-authority/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3710025). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.