Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFDA.
Is there PFAS in South Montebello Irrigation Dist. water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show South Montebello Irrigation Dist. averaged 18.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 4.5 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
South Montebello Irrigation Dist. is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Montebello, California, serving about 15,021 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 2 sampling points between May 2024 and Nov 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 4 | 20.1 ppt | 18.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 4 | 8.2 ppt | 7.7 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 4 | 6.7 ppt | 6.1 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 4 | 6.6 ppt | 6.0 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 4 | 4.9 ppt | 4.1 ppt | none |
| PFDA Perfluorodecanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 3.7 ppt | 1.9 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFBA, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, PFDoA, 6:2 FTS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, 4:2 FTS, PFHxS, PFHpA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 18.5 ppb, detected in 2 of 4 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Lemoore Naval Air Station none detected
- California Mens Colony none detected
- American Water O&m, LLC - Vafb none detected
- Sbdno County Service Area 64 none detected
- City of Livingston none detected
- City of Red Bluff 4 PFAS detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
90640
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in South Montebello Irrigation Dist. water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA1910153. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/south-montebello-irrigation-dist/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA1910153). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.