Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, PFHpA, PFPeS.
Is there PFAS in Riverside Highland Water Company water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Riverside Highland Water Company averaged 16.5 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 4.1 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Riverside Highland Water Company is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Grand Terrace, California, serving about 20,188 people, including Grand Terrace, Riverside. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 6 times across 3 sampling points between Jul 2024 and Jan 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 6 | 19.0 ppt | 15.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 18.0 ppt | 16.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 17.0 ppt | 13.4 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 6 | 14.0 ppt | 12.5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 6 | 14.0 ppt | 11.3 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
3 of 6 | 13.0 ppt | 12.5 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 10.0 ppt | 10.0 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 8.2 ppt | 6.7 ppt | none |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
1 of 6 | 4.0 ppt | 2.0 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFTrDA, PFHpS, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, PFEESA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, NFDHA, PFMBA, PFMPA, HFPO-DA, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 8:2 FTS, ADONA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 11 ppb, detected in 3 of 6 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Lomita-city, Water Dept. 2 PFAS detected
- Norwalk - City, Water Dept. above an EPA limit
- West Kern Water District none detected
- Humboldt C.s.d. none detected
- Arvin Community Services Dist none detected
- Cal/am Water Company - Baldwin Hills none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
92313 92507
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Riverside Highland Water Company water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3610057. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/riverside-highland-water-company/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3610057). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.