Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS, PFDA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Pico WD water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Pico WD averaged 25.5 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 6.4 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Pico WD is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Pico Rivera, California, serving about 22,051 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 4 sampling points between Sep 2023 and May 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
8 of 8 | 28.0 ppt | 25.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
8 of 8 | 21.0 ppt | 17.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
8 of 8 | 17.0 ppt | 14.5 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
8 of 8 | 14.0 ppt | 12.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
8 of 8 | 10.0 ppt | 9.4 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
8 of 8 | 7.3 ppt | 7.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
5 of 8 | 5.7 ppt | 5.3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFDA Perfluorodecanoic acid |
1 of 8 | 5.1 ppt | 2.6 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
3 of 8 | 4.0 ppt | 3.7 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, PFMPA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, ADONA, PFMBA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Temescal Valley Water District none detected
- City of Shafter none detected
- Menlo Park Municipal Water none detected
- Linda County Water District none detected
- City of Imperial none detected
- Santa Fe I.d. 2 PFAS detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
90660
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Pico WD water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA1910125. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/pico-wd/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA1910125). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.