Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFBA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Orchard Dale Water District water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Orchard Dale Water District averaged 20.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 5.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Orchard Dale Water District is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Whittier, California, serving about 25,000 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 2 times across 1 sampling point between Oct 2024 and Apr 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 23.0 ppt | 20.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 10.0 ppt | 9.2 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 9.9 ppt | 9.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 8.8 ppt | 8.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 7.2 ppt | 6.9 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 7.2 ppt | 6.8 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 4.0 ppt | 3.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: ADONA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpA, PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NFDHA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, HFPO-DA, PFPeS, NMeFOSAA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFHpS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- City of Patterson none detected
- Sunnyslope County Water Dist above an EPA limit
- Mountain House Community Services Dist. none detected
- City of Seal Beach none detected
- City of Norco above an EPA limit
- City of Loma Linda none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
90604 90605
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Orchard Dale Water District water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA1910101. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/orchard-dale-water-district/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA1910101). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.