Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in East Valley Water District water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show East Valley Water District averaged 12.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 3.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
East Valley Water District is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Highland, California, serving about 108,629 people, including Highland, San Bernardino. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 28 times across 13 sampling points between Oct 2024 and Jul 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
3 of 28 | 12.0 ppt | 12.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 28 | 9.0 ppt | 8.7 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 28 | 8.9 ppt | 8.2 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 28 | 4.7 ppt | 4.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 28 | 4.7 ppt | 4.4 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 28 | 4.0 ppt | 3.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 28 | 3.1 ppt | 1.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFEESA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, ADONA, PFMBA, PFTrDA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFTA, NEtFOSAA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NMeFOSAA, PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 56.2 ppb, detected in 21 of 28 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Santa Maria Water Department none detected
- Mesa Water District none detected
- Azusa Light and Water 3 PFAS detected
- Great Oaks Wc INC 4 PFAS detected
- Downey - City, Water Dept. above an EPA limit
- Torrance-city, Water Dept. none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
92346 92404 92410
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in East Valley Water District water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3610064. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/east-valley-water-district/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3610064). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.