Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA.
Is there PFAS in Crestline Village Cwd - Division 10 water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Crestline Village Cwd - Division 10 averaged 15.9 ppt of PFHxS at its worst sampling point, 1.6 times the EPA limit of 10 ppt.
Crestline Village Cwd - Division 10 is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Crestline, California, serving about 11,650 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 52 times across 16 sampling points between Jan 2024 and Jan 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 52 | 18.3 ppt | 15.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
11 of 52 | 12.2 ppt | 10.5 ppt | none |
| PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid |
1 of 52 | 7.1 ppt | 1.8 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 52 | 5.2 ppt | 1.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 52 | 4.5 ppt | 2.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
5 of 52 | 4.5 ppt | 3.4 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
4 of 52 | 4.4 ppt | 2.7 ppt | none |
Not detected: NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFTA, PFBA, PFHpA, PFDA, PFDoA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, HFPO-DA, ADONA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 22.2 ppb, detected in 36 of 52 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Greenfield County WD none detected
- City of Sonoma above an EPA limit
- Ccwd - Ebbetts Pass none detected
- Town of Hillsborough none detected
- Los Angeles Cwwd 40, R 24,27,33-pearblsm none detected
- Signal Hill - City, Water Dept. none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
92325
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Crestline Village Cwd - Division 10 water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3610015. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/crestline-village-cwd-division-10/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3610015). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.