Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in City of Redding water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Redding averaged 14.1 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 3.5 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Redding is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Redding, California, serving about 89,628 people, including Redding, Shasta. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 25 times across 11 sampling points between Mar 2023 and Dec 2023.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 25 | 16.2 ppt | 14.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 25 | 12.6 ppt | 11.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 25 | 8.9 ppt | 7.2 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 25 | 8.9 ppt | 8.8 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 25 | 6.8 ppt | 6.2 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 25 | 6.4 ppt | 5.9 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 25 | 5.1 ppt | 4.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: NFDHA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFEESA, HFPO-DA, PFPeS, PFMBA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFHpS, PFNA, PFDA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 27.8 ppb, detected in 4 of 25 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- Placer Cwa - Foothill none detected
- Santa Monica-city, Water Division 6 PFAS detected
- City of Westminster above an EPA limit
- Cal Am Water Company - Monterey above an EPA limit
- Olivenhain Mwd none detected
- City of Redwood City none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
96001 96002 96003 96087
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Redding water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA4510005. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-redding/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA4510005). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.