Is there PFAS in City of Bakersfield water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Bakersfield averaged 8.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 2.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
City of Bakersfield is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in San Jose, California, serving about 160,144 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 87 times across 43 sampling points between Jul 2024 and May 2026.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
5 of 87 | 8.4 ppt | 8.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid |
2 of 87 | 4.7 ppt | 4.5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 87 | 4.2 ppt | 4.1 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: PFMBA, PFHpA, PFBS, PFPeA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHxA, NEtFOSAA, PFEESA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpS, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFDA, PFOA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 14.8 ppb, detected in 4 of 87 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in California
- City of Sunnyvale none detected
- City of Hayward none detected
- Pasadena-city, Water Dept. none detected
- City of Roseville none detected
- California Water Service CO. - Ela above an EPA limit
- Santa Margarita Water District none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
93301 93308 93309 93311 93312 93313 93314
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Bakersfield water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA1510031. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-bakersfield/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA1510031). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.