Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in City of Atwater water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Atwater averaged 22.5 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 5.6 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

City of Atwater Serves 29,479 people · 16 PFOA samples from 8 sampling points · Oct 2023 to May 2024 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 16.5 ppt avg · max 33.0
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 22.5 ppt avg · max 45.0
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 29.5 ppt avg · max 59.0
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 3.0 avg · max 5.9
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpA, PFBA, PFPeS, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

City of Atwater is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Atwater, California, serving about 29,479 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 16 times across 8 sampling points between Oct 2023 and May 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
8 of 16 59.0 ppt 29.5 ppt 10 ppt
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
3 of 16 45.0 ppt 22.5 ppt 4 ppt
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
3 of 16 33.0 ppt 16.5 ppt 4 ppt
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
8 of 16 27.0 ppt 20.5 ppt none
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
5 of 16 25.0 ppt 12.5 ppt none
6:2 FTS
6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid
1 of 16 13.0 ppt 6.5 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
3 of 16 12.0 ppt 6.0 ppt none
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
2 of 16 11.0 ppt 9.5 ppt none
PFPeS
Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid
2 of 16 8.2 ppt 4.1 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
3 of 16 7.8 ppt 3.9 ppt none

Not detected: ADONA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, HFPO-DA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFUnA, PFDA, PFNA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFDoA, PFHpS, PFMBA, PFMPA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in California

All 707 tested systems in California

ZIP codes served

95301

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Atwater water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA2410001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-atwater/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA2410001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.