Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFHpA, PFHxA.
Is there PFAS in Lubeck PSD water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Lubeck PSD averaged 89.8 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 22.4 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Lubeck PSD is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Washington, West Virginia, serving about 11,724 people, including Parkersburg, Belleville, Mineral Wells, Ravenswood, Washington. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 2 times across 1 sampling point between Dec 2023 and Jun 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 2 | 180 ppt | 89.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 2 | 18.2 ppt | 9.1 ppt | none |
| HFPO-DA GenX (HFPO-DA) |
1 of 2 | 8.0 ppt | 4.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 2 | 4.4 ppt | 2.2 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
1 of 2 | 3.2 ppt | 1.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFUnA, PFOS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFMPA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFHxS, NEtFOSAA, PFNA, PFMBA, PFPeA, 8:2 FTS, PFBS, PFTA, PFTrDA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in West Virginia
- Lewisburg none detected
- Wvawc Bluefield District none detected
- Kenova Municipal Water none detected
- Vienna 2 PFAS detected
- City of Bridgeport 1 PFAS detected
- St Albans Water none detected
All 103 tested systems in West Virginia
ZIP codes served
26101 26133 26150 26164 26181
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Lubeck PSD water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID WV3305404. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/west-virginia/lubeck-psd/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID WV3305404). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.