Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Fort Bliss Main Post Area water?

Yes, at low levels. 2 PFAS were detected, all below EPA's 2024 limits.

Fort Bliss Main Post Area Serves 28,000 people · 4 PFOA samples from 2 sampling points · Jan 2024 to Jul 2024 PFAS found, below EPA limits
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 1.9 ppt avg · max 3.7
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.2 avg · max 0.4
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Fort Bliss Main Post Area is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in San Dimas, Texas, serving about 28,000 people, including El Paso, Fort Bliss. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 2 sampling points between Jan 2024 and Jul 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
1 of 4 3.7 ppt 1.9 ppt 10 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
1 of 4 3.1 ppt 1.6 ppt none

Not detected: HFPO-DA, PFBA, PFUnA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFDoA, PFDA, PFOA, PFBS, 6:2 FTS, PFTA, PFNA, 4:2 FTS, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFPeA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFHpA, NEtFOSAA, PFOS.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 40.8 ppb, detected in 4 of 4 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Levels here are under EPA's limits, so no treatment is required. If you want them lower anyway, a certified reverse osmosis system under the sink handles drinking water, and a whole-house carbon filter also takes out the chlorine or chloramine your utility adds.

Other systems in Texas

All 1154 tested systems in Texas

ZIP codes served

79904 79906 79908 79916 79918 79930

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Fort Bliss Main Post Area water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TX0710020. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/texas/fort-bliss-main-post-area/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TX0710020). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.