Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Fort Campbell Water System water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Fort Campbell Water System averaged 24.8 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 6.2 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Fort Campbell Water System Serves 43,270 people · 4 PFOA samples from 1 sampling point · Jan 2023 to Jan 2024 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 5.8 ppt avg · max 6.4
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 24.8 ppt avg · max 27.3
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 30.1 ppt avg · max 33.6
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 3.0 avg · max 3.4
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBS, PFHpA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Fort Campbell Water System is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Ft. Campbell, Tennessee, serving about 43,270 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Jan 2023 and Jan 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
4 of 4 33.6 ppt 30.1 ppt 10 ppt
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
4 of 4 27.3 ppt 24.8 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
4 of 4 9.7 ppt 7.2 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
4 of 4 7.9 ppt 6.0 ppt none
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
4 of 4 6.4 ppt 5.8 ppt 4 ppt
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
4 of 4 3.6 ppt 3.5 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
1 of 4 3.2 ppt 0.8 ppt none

Not detected: PFNA, PFDA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFHpS, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Tennessee

All 277 tested systems in Tennessee

ZIP codes served

42223

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Fort Campbell Water System water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID TN0000820. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/tennessee/fort-campbell-water-system/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID TN0000820). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.