Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Mid-dakota Rural Water water?

No PFAS were detected in any of the 4 samples EPA's program collected.

Mid-dakota Rural Water Serves 11,833 people · 4 PFOA samples from 1 sampling point · Jan 2023 to Oct 2023 No PFAS detected
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid not detected
EPA 4
Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Mid-dakota Rural Water is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Miller, South Dakota, serving about 11,833 people, including Alpena, Carpenter, Cavour, Gann Valley, Highmore, Stephan. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Jan 2023 and Oct 2023.

Every PFAS detected

None of the 29 PFAS were found at or above EPA's minimum reporting levels (2 to 20 ppt depending on the compound).

Not detected: ADONA, PFDoA, PFHxA, PFDA, PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, HFPO-DA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 8:2 FTS, PFBS, PFHxS, PFPeS, PFUnA, 6:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFHpS, PFMBA, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFPeA, 4:2 FTS, PFBA, PFHpA, NMeFOSAA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 60 ppb, detected in 4 of 4 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

No PFAS action is needed on these results. If your water tastes or smells of chlorine, a whole-house city water filter is the usual fix.

Other systems in South Dakota

All 49 tested systems in South Dakota

ZIP codes served

57312 57322 57324 57341 57345 57346 57348 57350 57353 57358 57359 57362 57371 57373 57379 57381 57382 57384 57385 57386 57399 57442 57450 57455 57466 57467 57469 57470 57475 57476 57501 57520 57522 57536 57540 57564

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Mid-dakota Rural Water water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID SD4602175. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/south-dakota/mid-dakota-rural-water/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID SD4602175). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.