Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Gsw&sa (sc2620004) water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Gsw&sa (sc2620004) averaged 6.2 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.6 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Gsw&sa (sc2620004) is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Conway, South Carolina, serving about 252,840 people, including Aynor, Conway, Galivants Ferry, Green Sea, Longs, Loris. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 20 times across 7 sampling points between Jul 2023 and May 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
9 of 20 | 11.8 ppt | 5.3 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
9 of 20 | 11.5 ppt | 6.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
9 of 20 | 11.4 ppt | 6.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
9 of 20 | 7.2 ppt | 3.6 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
5 of 20 | 7.2 ppt | 3.4 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
7 of 20 | 5.6 ppt | 2.8 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
7 of 20 | 4.8 ppt | 2.5 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFHxS, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, HFPO-DA, PFPeS, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFHpS, NMeFOSAA, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFTA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 30.1 ppb, detected in 9 of 23 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in South Carolina
- Charleston Water System (sc1010001) above an EPA limit
- Spartanburg Water System (4210001) none detected
- Bjw&sa (0720003) above an EPA limit
- Columbia City of (sc4010001) above an EPA limit
- Bcwsa Sangaree W/d (0820002) above an EPA limit
- Mt Pleasant Water Works (1010002) above an EPA limit
All 165 tested systems in South Carolina
ZIP codes served
29511 29526 29527 29544 29545 29568 29569 29575 29576 29577 29579 29581 29588
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Gsw&sa (sc2620004) water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID SC2620004. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/south-carolina/gsw-and-sa-sc2620004/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID SC2620004). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.