Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Bcwsa Main Lower South water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Bcwsa Main Lower South averaged 5.1 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Bcwsa Main Lower South is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Warrington, Pennsylvania, serving about 52,621 people, including Southampton, Warminster, Huntingdon Valley, Langhorne, Feasterville Trevose, Levittown. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 16 times across 4 sampling points between Feb 2024 and Nov 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
7 of 16 | 19.0 ppt | 10.8 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
7 of 16 | 11.5 ppt | 7.5 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
4 of 16 | 7.5 ppt | 4.9 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
6 of 16 | 7.3 ppt | 5.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 16 | 6.9 ppt | 4.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 16 | 5.6 ppt | 4.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 16 | 4.8 ppt | 2.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
3 of 16 | 3.2 ppt | 2.3 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFNA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, HFPO-DA, PFPeS, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, NFDHA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, PFEESA, NEtFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Pennsylvania
- Paw Nesbitt none detected
- Paw Watres none detected
- Williamsport Mun Water Auth 5 PFAS detected
- Pa Amer Water CO 5 PFAS detected
- Pa American Royersford above an EPA limit
- Greater Johnstown Wa Riverside none detected
All 390 tested systems in Pennsylvania
ZIP codes served
18966 18974 19006 19047 19053 19056
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Bcwsa Main Lower South water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID PA1090079. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/pennsylvania/bcwsa-main-lower-south/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID PA1090079). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.