Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, 9Cl-PF3ONS.
Is there PFAS in Ponca City Mun Water water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Ponca City Mun Water averaged 6.8 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 1.7 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Ponca City Mun Water is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Ponca City, Oklahoma, serving about 27,155 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between Feb 2024 and Nov 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 4 | 8.1 ppt | 6.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 4 | 6.7 ppt | 5.7 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 4 | 5.3 ppt | 4.7 ppt | none |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS 9Cl-PF3ONS (F-53B major) |
1 of 4 | 3.4 ppt | 0.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFMPA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, PFUnA, 8:2 FTS, PFMBA, PFPeA, PFPeS, PFEESA, PFHpS, 6:2 FTS, PFTrDA, NFDHA, PFHxA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, PFOA, PFDoA, PFNA, PFDA, 4:2 FTS, PFHpA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 19.4 ppb, detected in 4 of 4 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Oklahoma
- Wagoner CO. Rwd #4 above an EPA limit
- Sand Springs none detected
- Washington CO Rwd #3 (new,#1) none detected
- Ardmore none detected
- Tinker Afb Bio-env Eng 1 PFAS detected
- Shawnee Municipal Authority 2 PFAS detected
All 166 tested systems in Oklahoma
ZIP codes served
74604
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Ponca City Mun Water water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID OK1021202. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/oklahoma/ponca-city-mun-water/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID OK1021202). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.