Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Moore CO Public Util-pinehurst water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Moore CO Public Util-pinehurst averaged 6.5 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 1.6 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Moore CO Public Util-pinehurst is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Carthage, North Carolina, serving about 31,390 people, including West End, Cameron, Carthage, Pinehurst, Southern Pines, Vass. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 38 times across 18 sampling points between Sep 2023 and Aug 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 38 | 18.8 ppt | 7.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 38 | 18.3 ppt | 7.8 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
1 of 38 | 13.6 ppt | 4.5 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 38 | 10.5 ppt | 3.5 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 38 | 9.6 ppt | 6.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 38 | 8.5 ppt | 4.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 38 | 6.5 ppt | 2.2 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
5 of 38 | 4.5 ppt | 4.4 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFMPA, PFTA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, PFUnA, 8:2 FTS, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, 4:2 FTS, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, NMeFOSAA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in North Carolina
- Davie County Water System none detected
- Town of Clayton above an EPA limit
- City of Statesville none detected
- Pender County Utilities 4 PFAS detected
- Dare County Water System none detected
- City of Goldsboro above an EPA limit
All 291 tested systems in North Carolina
ZIP codes served
27376 28326 28327 28374 28387 28394
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Moore CO Public Util-pinehurst water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC0363108. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/moore-co-public-util-pinehurst/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC0363108). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.