Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Johnston Co-east water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Johnston Co-east averaged 6.4 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 1.6 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Johnston Co-east is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Smithfield, North Carolina, serving about 25,212 people, including Benson, Four Oaks, Clayton, Kenly, Middlesex, Princeton. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 20 times across 5 sampling points between Dec 2023 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
3 of 20 | 14.4 ppt | 6.9 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
3 of 20 | 9.7 ppt | 6.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 8.2 ppt | 5.5 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 7.8 ppt | 5.7 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 20 | 7.7 ppt | 4.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
3 of 20 | 5.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 20 | 3.8 ppt | 1.9 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 20 | 3.3 ppt | 0.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFNA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, 6:2 FTS, PFPeS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, NFDHA, PFTrDA, PFHpS, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, PFEESA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in North Carolina
- City of Lenoir none detected
- City of Lumberton above an EPA limit
- Franklin County Water & Sewer 1 PFAS detected
- Currituck County Water System none detected
- Town of Southern Pines none detected
- City of Shelby none detected
All 291 tested systems in North Carolina
ZIP codes served
27504 27524 27527 27542 27557 27569 27576 27577 27591 27597 28334 28366
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Johnston Co-east water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC4051018. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/johnston-co-east/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC4051018). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.