Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA.
Is there PFAS in City of Rockingham water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
City of Rockingham is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Rockingham, North Carolina, serving about 12,510 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 12 times across 3 sampling points between Feb 2023 and Nov 2023.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
5 of 12 | 4.9 ppt | 3.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 12 | 4.4 ppt | 2.0 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 12 | 4.4 ppt | 2.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 12 | 3.7 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
1 of 12 | 3.2 ppt | 0.8 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: PFMPA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, ADONA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFHpS, PFDA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, PFPeS, PFNA, 4:2 FTS, PFBS, PFDoA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NMeFOSAA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFHpA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in North Carolina
- Town of Aberdeen above an EPA limit
- West Wilkes Wtr Association INC 1 PFAS detected
- City of Dunn above an EPA limit
- City of Archdale above an EPA limit
- Perquimans County Water System none detected
- Sampson CO Wtr Dist Ii none detected
All 291 tested systems in North Carolina
ZIP codes served
28379
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Rockingham water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC0377015. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/city-of-rockingham/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC0377015). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.