Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFPeS, PFBA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Bayleaf Master water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Bayleaf Master averaged 140 ppt of PFHxS at its worst sampling point, 14.0 times the EPA limit of 10 ppt.
Bayleaf Master is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Cary, North Carolina, serving about 16,715 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 216 times across 108 sampling points between Dec 2024 and Sep 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
28 of 216 | 153 ppt | 140 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
61 of 216 | 59.1 ppt | 56.6 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
50 of 216 | 57.3 ppt | 55.0 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
46 of 216 | 39.6 ppt | 37.8 ppt | none |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
2 of 216 | 36.4 ppt | 32.5 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
16 of 216 | 21.3 ppt | 15.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
8 of 216 | 17.8 ppt | 17.1 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
11 of 216 | 13.7 ppt | 11.1 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
18 of 216 | 10.4 ppt | 9.9 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, NMeFOSAA, PFNA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, 6:2 FTS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 16.3 ppb, detected in 24 of 216 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in North Carolina
- Usmc Lejeune--holcomb Blvd none detected
- City of Lincolnton above an EPA limit
- Wayne Water Districts Purchase 4 PFAS detected
- Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point none detected
- City of Belmont 2 PFAS detected
- Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist 1 PFAS detected
All 291 tested systems in North Carolina
ZIP codes served
27614
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Bayleaf Master water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NC0392373. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/north-carolina/bayleaf-master/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NC0392373). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.