Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, 6:2 FTS, PFHxA.
Is there PFAS in Port Washington WD water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Port Washington WD is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Port Washington, New York, serving about 34,000 people, including Manhasset, Port Washington. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 18 times across 9 sampling points between Feb 2023 and Jun 2026.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 18 | 6.9 ppt | 6.5 ppt | none |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid |
1 of 18 | 6.5 ppt | 3.2 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 18 | 5.3 ppt | 2.6 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 18 | 4.7 ppt | 2.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid |
1 of 18 | 4.2 ppt | 2.1 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 18 | 3.6 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFUnA, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFBA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, PFHpS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFHxS, PFDoA, PFDA, PFHpA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFBS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in New York
- Fort Drum 6 PFAS detected
- Plainview WD 1 PFAS detected
- Dix Hills Water District 2 PFAS detected
- Bethpage WD 4 PFAS detected
- Long Beach City none detected
- Clifton Park Water Authority 1 PFAS detected
All 334 tested systems in New York
ZIP codes served
11030 11050
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Port Washington WD water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NY2912267. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-york/port-washington-wd/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NY2912267). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.