Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Waldwick Water Dept water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Waldwick Water Dept averaged 20.6 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 5.2 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Waldwick Water Dept is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Waldwick, New Jersey, serving about 10,208 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 9 times across 6 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Jan 2026.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
9 of 9 | 30.7 ppt | 30.7 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
4 of 9 | 23.3 ppt | 20.6 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
6 of 9 | 13.8 ppt | 12.4 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 9 | 12.0 ppt | 12.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 9 | 10.2 ppt | 10.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
4 of 9 | 7.1 ppt | 6.6 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 9 | 7.0 ppt | 7.0 ppt | none |
| PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid |
2 of 9 | 5.5 ppt | 5.5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 9 | 3.9 ppt | 3.8 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, 6:2 FTS, PFDA, PFDoA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFUnA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFMPA, NMeFOSAA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, NEtFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 13.1 ppb, detected in 4 of 9 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in New Jersey
- Pine Hill Borough Mua none detected
- Woodbury City W Dept 2 PFAS detected
- Wanaque W Dept. above an EPA limit
- Keansburg Water & Sewer Dept. above an EPA limit
- Surf City Water Dept none detected
- Nj American Water - Washington/oxford above an EPA limit
All 266 tested systems in New Jersey
ZIP codes served
07463
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Waldwick Water Dept water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NJ0264001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-jersey/waldwick-water-dept/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NJ0264001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.