Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Waldwick Water Dept water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Waldwick Water Dept averaged 20.6 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 5.2 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Waldwick Water Dept Serves 10,208 people · 9 PFOA samples from 6 sampling points · Apr 2023 to Jan 2026 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 20.6 ppt avg · max 23.3
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 10.2 ppt avg
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 3.8 ppt avg · max 3.9
EPA 10
PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid 5.5 ppt avg
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.9 avg
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Waldwick Water Dept is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Waldwick, New Jersey, serving about 10,208 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 9 times across 6 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Jan 2026.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
9 of 9 30.7 ppt 30.7 ppt none
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
4 of 9 23.3 ppt 20.6 ppt 4 ppt
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
6 of 9 13.8 ppt 12.4 ppt none
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
4 of 9 12.0 ppt 12.0 ppt none
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
4 of 9 10.2 ppt 10.2 ppt 4 ppt
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
4 of 9 7.1 ppt 6.6 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
4 of 9 7.0 ppt 7.0 ppt none
PFNA
Perfluorononanoic acid
2 of 9 5.5 ppt 5.5 ppt 10 ppt
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
2 of 9 3.9 ppt 3.8 ppt 10 ppt

Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, 6:2 FTS, PFDA, PFDoA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFUnA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFMPA, NMeFOSAA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, NEtFOSAA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 13.1 ppb, detected in 4 of 9 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in New Jersey

All 266 tested systems in New Jersey

ZIP codes served

07463

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Waldwick Water Dept water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NJ0264001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-jersey/waldwick-water-dept/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NJ0264001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.