Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Verona Water Department water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Verona Water Department averaged 43.4 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 10.8 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Verona Water Department Serves 13,641 people · 8 PFOA samples from 3 sampling points · Jun 2025 to Mar 2026 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 43.4 ppt avg · max 44.5
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 11.2 ppt avg · max 12.2
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 12.3 ppt avg · max 13.3
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 1.2 avg · max 1.3
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFBS, PFHpA, PFHxA, PFPeA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Verona Water Department is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Verona, New Jersey, serving about 13,641 people, including Caldwell, Cedar Grove, Essex Fells, Montclair, Verona, West Orange. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 3 sampling points between Jun 2025 and Mar 2026.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
5 of 8 44.5 ppt 43.4 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
2 of 8 13.3 ppt 12.3 ppt 10 ppt
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
2 of 8 12.2 ppt 11.2 ppt 4 ppt
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
2 of 8 5.5 ppt 5.3 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
2 of 8 5.4 ppt 5.0 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
2 of 8 4.9 ppt 4.7 ppt none
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
2 of 8 4.6 ppt 4.5 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
3 of 8 3.6 ppt 3.5 ppt none

Not detected: PFMPA, PFNA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, 4:2 FTS, PFDA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in New Jersey

All 266 tested systems in New Jersey

ZIP codes served

07006 07009 07021 07043 07044 07052

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Verona Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NJ0720001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-jersey/verona-water-department/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NJ0720001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.