Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFBS, PFPeA, PFBA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Parsippany-troy Hills Water Department water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Parsippany-troy Hills Water Department averaged 10.4 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 2.6 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Parsippany-troy Hills Water Department is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Parsippany, New Jersey, serving about 50,400 people, including Lake Hiawatha, Parsippany, Morris Plains. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 29 times across 14 sampling points between Sep 2023 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
26 of 29 | 10.9 ppt | 10.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
6 of 29 | 9.3 ppt | 7.7 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
16 of 29 | 8.3 ppt | 7.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
18 of 29 | 8.0 ppt | 7.4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
13 of 29 | 7.0 ppt | 6.8 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
13 of 29 | 6.9 ppt | 6.3 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
5 of 29 | 5.9 ppt | 5.7 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
3 of 29 | 3.2 ppt | 1.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFTA, PFMPA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, ADONA, 6:2 FTS, PFDoA, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA, HFPO-DA, PFDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFNA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in New Jersey
- East Brunswick Water Utility 1 PFAS detected
- Hoboken Water Utility above an EPA limit
- Perth Amboy Water Department above an EPA limit
- Washington Township Mua above an EPA limit
- Bloomfield Water Department none detected
- Nj American Water - Mount Holly 4 PFAS detected
All 266 tested systems in New Jersey
ZIP codes served
07034 07054 07950
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Parsippany-troy Hills Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NJ1429001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-jersey/parsippany-troy-hills-water-department/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NJ1429001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.