Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Livingston Twp Div of Water water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Livingston Twp Div of Water averaged 37.0 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 9.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Livingston Twp Div of Water Serves 27,391 people · 21 PFOA samples from 10 sampling points · Aug 2024 to May 2025 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 37.0 ppt avg · max 44.0
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 5.0 ppt avg · max 5.7
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 6.3 ppt avg · max 7.1
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.6 avg · max 0.7
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA, PFBA, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Livingston Twp Div of Water is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Livingston, New Jersey, serving about 27,391 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 21 times across 10 sampling points between Aug 2024 and May 2025.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
21 of 21 44.0 ppt 37.0 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
12 of 21 7.8 ppt 7.6 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
13 of 21 7.7 ppt 7.6 ppt none
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
9 of 21 7.3 ppt 7.1 ppt none
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
11 of 21 7.1 ppt 6.3 ppt 10 ppt
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
13 of 21 6.5 ppt 6.4 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
11 of 21 5.8 ppt 5.7 ppt none
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
10 of 21 5.7 ppt 5.0 ppt 4 ppt

Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFTA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFTrDA, ADONA, NEtFOSAA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFNA, HFPO-DA, NMeFOSAA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 13 ppb, detected in 5 of 21 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in New Jersey

All 266 tested systems in New Jersey

ZIP codes served

07039

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Livingston Twp Div of Water water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NJ0710001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-jersey/livingston-twp-div-of-water/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NJ0710001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.