Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Exeter Water Dept water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Exeter Water Dept is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Exeter, New Hampshire, serving about 12,236 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 6 times across 2 sampling points between Jan 2024 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 13.0 ppt | 4.8 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 6.0 ppt | 2.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 4.0 ppt | 2.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 6 | 4.0 ppt | 2.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 4.0 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 6 | 3.0 ppt | 0.8 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 6 | 3.0 ppt | 1.5 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFPeS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFTA, PFHpS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NEtFOSAA, ADONA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, HFPO-DA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in New Hampshire
- Somersworth Water Works none detected
- Lebanon Water Dept none detected
- Seabrook Water Dept 3 PFAS detected
- Unh/durham Water Sys none detected
- Hudson Water Dept above an EPA limit
- Laconia Water Works none detected
All 51 tested systems in New Hampshire
ZIP codes served
03833
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Exeter Water Dept water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID NH0801010. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/new-hampshire/exeter-water-dept/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID NH0801010). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.