Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Springfield Pws water?

Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.

Springfield Pws Serves 210,898 people · 10 PFOA samples from 3 sampling points · Mar 2024 to Dec 2024 One or more samples at an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 1.1 ppt avg · max 4.3
EPA 4
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined not detected
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Springfield Pws is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Springfield, Missouri, serving about 210,898 people, including Brookline, Ozark, Republic, Rogersville, Strafford, Turners. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 10 times across 3 sampling points between Mar 2024 and Dec 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
1 of 10 4.3 ppt 1.1 ppt 4 ppt
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
1 of 10 3.0 ppt 0.8 ppt none

Not detected: 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFPeA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, HFPO-DA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFTA, PFUnA, PFHxA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFHxS, PFHpA, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFNA, ADONA, PFOA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 10.7 ppb, detected in 1 of 10 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Missouri

All 232 tested systems in Missouri

ZIP codes served

65619 65721 65738 65742 65757 65765 65781 65801 65802 65803 65804 65805 65806 65807 65808 65809 65810

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Springfield Pws water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MO5010754. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/missouri/springfield-pws/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MO5010754). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.