Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Woodbury water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Woodbury averaged 12.8 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 3.2 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Woodbury is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Woodbury, Minnesota, serving about 82,643 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 12 sampling points between Mar 2023 and Dec 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
24 of 24 | 386 ppt | 332 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
22 of 24 | 17.2 ppt | 16.6 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
19 of 24 | 17.1 ppt | 12.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
7 of 24 | 17.0 ppt | 15.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 24 | 8.4 ppt | 4.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
16 of 24 | 7.2 ppt | 7.0 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
13 of 24 | 6.7 ppt | 6.5 ppt | none |
Not detected: 4:2 FTS, PFTA, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFDoA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFNA, PFDA, 6:2 FTS, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Minnesota
- Maple Grove 1 PFAS detected
- Duluth none detected
- Plymouth 1 PFAS detected
- Brooklyn Park above an EPA limit
- Bloomington 1 PFAS detected
- Saint Cloud 1 PFAS detected
All 196 tested systems in Minnesota
ZIP codes served
55125
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Woodbury water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MN1820025. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/minnesota/woodbury/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MN1820025). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.