Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Sauk Rapids water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Sauk Rapids averaged 32.2 ppt of PFHxS at its worst sampling point, 3.2 times the EPA limit of 10 ppt.
Sauk Rapids is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Sauk Rapids, Minnesota, serving about 13,835 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 6 times across 3 sampling points between Jul 2023 and Feb 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 6 | 34.2 ppt | 32.2 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
5 of 6 | 14.6 ppt | 12.4 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 6 | 12.0 ppt | 9.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
5 of 6 | 9.1 ppt | 7.6 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
4 of 6 | 8.1 ppt | 6.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 6 | 7.4 ppt | 5.9 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 6.0 ppt | 5.0 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 6 | 3.6 ppt | 1.8 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFDA, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, NEtFOSAA, PFHpS, 4:2 FTS, PFPeS, 6:2 FTS, PFNA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 9.1 ppb, detected in 1 of 6 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Minnesota
- Marshall 1 PFAS detected
- Lincoln-Pipestone Rural Water System none detected
- New Ulm none detected
- Worthington none detected
- Fergus Falls none detected
- Waconia none detected
All 196 tested systems in Minnesota
ZIP codes served
56379
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Sauk Rapids water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MN1050004. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/minnesota/sauk-rapids/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MN1050004). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.