Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Hastings water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Hastings averaged 21.0 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 5.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Hastings Serves 23,222 people · 10 PFOA samples from 5 sampling points · Nov 2024 to Oct 2025 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 21.0 ppt avg · max 23.7
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 4.5 ppt avg · max 4.6
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 1.7 ppt avg · max 3.4
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.2 avg · max 0.3
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Hastings is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Hastings, Minnesota, serving about 23,222 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 10 times across 5 sampling points between Nov 2024 and Oct 2025.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
10 of 10 380 ppt 239 ppt none
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
9 of 10 23.7 ppt 21.0 ppt 4 ppt
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
10 of 10 20.5 ppt 17.4 ppt none
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
9 of 10 9.2 ppt 7.6 ppt none
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
2 of 10 4.6 ppt 4.5 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
2 of 10 3.4 ppt 1.7 ppt 10 ppt
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
1 of 10 3.3 ppt 1.6 ppt none

Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFUnA, PFTA, PFDoA, PFDA, ADONA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, NMeFOSAA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFEESA, PFHpA, PFNA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Minnesota

All 196 tested systems in Minnesota

ZIP codes served

55033

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Hastings water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MN1190012. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/minnesota/hastings/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MN1190012). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.