Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Marshfield Water Department water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Marshfield Water Department averaged 6.9 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.7 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Marshfield Water Department is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Marshfield, Massachusetts, serving about 34,000 people, including Brant Rock, Green Harbor, Humarock, Marshfield, Marshfield Hills, North Marshfield. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 31 times across 16 sampling points between Mar 2024 and Mar 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
9 of 31 | 14.7 ppt | 13.9 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
9 of 31 | 11.7 ppt | 11.1 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
8 of 31 | 7.0 ppt | 6.9 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 31 | 6.0 ppt | 5.8 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 31 | 4.6 ppt | 2.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
4 of 31 | 3.9 ppt | 3.8 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 31 | 3.2 ppt | 3.1 ppt | none |
Not detected: HFPO-DA, PFUnA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFDoA, PFDA, 6:2 FTS, NEtFOSAA, PFHpS, NMeFOSAA, PFTA, PFNA, PFHxS, NFDHA, PFTrDA, 4:2 FTS, PFPeS, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 19.3 ppb, detected in 1 of 32 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Massachusetts
- Lexington Water Dept. (mwra) none detected
- Franklin Water Department above an EPA limit
- Abington/rockland Joint Wtr. Works above an EPA limit
- Hyannis Water System, Town of Barnstable 3 PFAS detected
- Brewster Water Department none detected
- Randolph Water Department above an EPA limit
All 263 tested systems in Massachusetts
ZIP codes served
02020 02041 02047 02050 02051 02059 02065
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Marshfield Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MA4171000. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/massachusetts/marshfield-water-department/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MA4171000). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.