Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Holden Water Division, Dpw water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Holden Water Division, Dpw averaged 4.2 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.1 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Holden Water Division, Dpw is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Holden, Massachusetts, serving about 18,016 people, including Holden, Jefferson. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 10 times across 4 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Jan 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 16.2 ppt | 4.0 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 10 | 6.7 ppt | 3.4 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
5 of 10 | 5.5 ppt | 3.2 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 10 | 4.9 ppt | 4.2 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 10 | 3.3 ppt | 3.1 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFEESA, PFUnA, NEtFOSAA, PFTA, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFNA, PFOS, PFDA, PFPeS, PFHpS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, NFDHA, PFDoA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Massachusetts
- Pembroke Water Division Dpw 2 PFAS detected
- Webster Water Department 3 PFAS detected
- Greenfield Water Department none detected
- Somerset Water Department none detected
- Sudbury Water District above an EPA limit
- Orleans Water Department none detected
All 263 tested systems in Massachusetts
ZIP codes served
01520 01522
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Holden Water Division, Dpw water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MA2134000. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/massachusetts/holden-water-division-dpw/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MA2134000). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.